Incidence of Symptoms Associated with Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infectionin Non-Hospitalized Vaccinated Patients Receiving Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir (preprint)

Background: The role of Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NMV-r) in preventing post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is unknown. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of NMV-r in non-hospitalized, vaccinated patients on the occurrence of PASC. Methods: We performed a comparative retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the TriNetX research network, including vaccinated patients [≥]18 years old who subsequently developed Covid-19 between December 2021-April 2022. Cohorts were based on NMV-r administration within five days of diagnosis. Based on previously validated broad and narrow definitions, the main outcome was the presence of symptoms associated with PASC. Outcomes were assessed between 30-180 days and 90-180 days after the index Covid-19 infection. Results 1,004 patients remained in each cohort after propensity-score matching. PASC (broad definition) occurred in 425 patients (42%) in the NMV-r cohort, vs. 480 patients (48%) in the control cohort (OR 0.8 CI 0.67-0.96; p=0.01) from 30-180 days and in 273 patients (27%) in the NMV-r cohort, as compared to 347 patients (35%) in the control cohort (OR 0.707, CI 0.59-0.86; p<0.001) from 90-180 days. Narrowly defined PASC was reported in 337 (34%) patients in the NMV-r and 404 (40%) in the control cohort between 30-180 days (OR=0.75, CI 0.62-0.9, p=0.002) and in 221 (22%) in the NMV-r cohort as compared to in 278 (28%) patients in the control cohort (OR=0.7, CI 0.63-0.9, p=0.003) between 90 -180 days. Conclusions NMV-r treatment in non-hospitalized vaccinated patients with Covid-19 was associated with a reduction in the development of symptoms commonly observed with PASC and healthcare utilization.

Assessment of Building Energy Performance Integrated with Solar PV: Towards a Net Zero Energy Residential Campus in India

Building Applied Photovoltaics (BAPV) such as Roof-top Solar PV has gained significant attention in recent years for harnessing the untapped potential of renewable energy sources. However, rooftop PV poses hurdles of space restriction and shadowing in densely packed urban residential neighborhoods. This study aims to design and assess the feasibility of an integrated grid-connected Rooftop and Façade Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) for meeting the energy demand of residential buildings on an academic campus. Three distinctive groups of residential typologies have been investigated in this study, categorized based on built area and occupants' past energy usage. Additionally, the variation in the measured Energy Performance index of the three different residential groups is illustrated to pave the path for the development of a typology-based residential energy benchmarking and labelling system. The Solar PV system has been designed for the maximum household energy demand recorded in CoVID-affected years due to high residential electricity usage in this period. The study showcases that integration of façade BIPV for low-rise residential buildings increases the system energy production to up to 62.5% based on the utilized surface area for active PV. Furthermore, the Net Zero Energy Building (ZEB) potential for each typology has been achieved by integration of the proposed Solar PV, evaluated as a function of the Energy Performance Index (EPI) and Energy Generation Index (EGI). The designed nominal PV power of the proposed grid-connected plant is 5.6 MW, producing 7182 MWh annually, with a surplus of 3352 MWh/year (against the total residential electricity demand).

A review of strategies and their effectiveness in reducing indoor airborne transmission and improving indoor air quality.

Airborne transmission arises through the inhalation of aerosol droplets exhaled by an infected person and is now thought to be the primary transmission route of COVID-19. Thus, maintaining adequate indoor air quality levels is vital in mitigating the spread of the airborne virus. The cause-and-effect flow of various agents involved in airborne transmission of viruses has been investigated through a systematic literature review. It has been identified that the airborne virus can stay infectious in the air for hours, and pollutants such as particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), Ozone (O3), Carbon dioxide (CO2), and Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) and other air pollutants can enhance the incidence, spread and mortality rates of viral disease. Also, environmental quality parameters such as humidity and temperature have shown considerable influence in virus transmission in indoor spaces. The measures adopted in different research studies that can curb airborne transmission of viruses for an improved Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) have been collated for their effectiveness and limitations. A diverse set of building strategies, components, and operation techniques from the recent literature pertaining to the ongoing spread of COVID-19 disease has been systematically presented to understand the current state of techniques and building systems that can minimize the viral spread in built spaces This comprehensive review will help architects, builders, realtors, and other organizations improve or design a resilient building system to deal with COVID-19 or any such pandemic in the future.

Endothelin-1 is Increased in the Plasma of Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 (preprint)

Importance The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic continues to place a devastating strain on healthcare services worldwide and there remains an ongoing requirement for new treatments. A key mechanism recognised in progressive severe disease is virus-induced endothelial dysregulation. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), being the most highly expressed peptide in endothelial cells and potent vasoconstrictor of human blood vessels, represents a potential therapeutic target through the use of Endothelin receptor antagonists. Objective To investigate the association of plasma ET-1 with Covid-19 disease severity Design Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of Covid-19 patients divided into Group A (asymptomatic or symptoms not requiring hospitalisation), Group B (symptoms requiring hospitalisation) and Group C (symptoms requiring supplemental oxygen therapy or assisted ventilation) recruited between March and July 2020 (the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK). Data were compared with a contemporaneous cross-section of non-infected volunteers (Controls). Setting Single Tertiary National Health Service Hospital. Participants Tissue banked plasma samples were obtained from 194 patients. Exposures Quantitation of ET-1 in plasma by specific enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Main outcome and measures Pairwise comparison of ET-1 levels (median [IQR]) between patient categories, and subgroups defined by clinical outcomes. Results Baseline ET-1 plasma levels (pg/ml) were elevated in patients requiring hospitalisation compared with controls and patients with asymptomatic or mild infection (Group B: 1.59 [1.13-1.98], and Group C: 1.65 [1.02-2.32] versus controls: 0.68 [0.47-0.87], p=<0.001 and Group A: 0.72 [0.57-1.10], p=<0.001). ET-1 levels were also elevated in patients that died (2.09 [1.66-3.15]), developed acute kidney (1.70 [1.07-2.36]) or myocardial injury (1.50 [0.92-2.28]) compared with patients with an uncomplicated infection (1.00 [0.61-1.57], p=<0.01). Amongst surviving hospitalised patients, ET-1 concentrations decreased when measured at 28 days (Group B: 0.86 [0.60-1.61] and Group C: 1.17 [0.66-1.62] versus baseline, p=<0.05) and 90 days (Group B: 0.69 [0.59-1.38] and Group C: 1.01 [0.64-1.21] versus baseline, p=<0.05). Conclusions and relevance Hospitalised Covid-19 patients demonstrate elevated ET-1 levels during the acute phase of infection and this is associated with increasing clinical severity of the disease. The results support the hypothesis that endothelin receptor antagonists may be beneficial for certain Covid-19 patients.

Outcomes of patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis with COVID-19 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; from PCR to antibody.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis are vulnerable to contracting COVID-19 infection, with mortality as high as 31 % in this group. Population demographics in the UAE are dissimilar to many other countries and data on antibody responses to COVID-19 is also limited. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients who developed COVID-19, the impact of the screening strategy, and to assess the antibody response to a subset of dialysis patients. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of COVID19 infection in all our haemodialysis patients, who were tested regularly for COVID 19, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic. In addition, IgG antibody serology was also performed to assess response to COVID-19 in a subset of patients. RESULTS: 152 (13 %) of 1180 dialysis patients developed COVID-19 during the study period from 1st of March to the 1st of July 2020. Of these 81 % were male, average age of 52​ years and 95 % were on in-centre haemodialysis. Family and community contact was most likely source of infection in most patients. Fever (49 %) and cough (48 %) were the most common presenting symptoms, when present. Comorbidities in infected individuals included hypertension (93 %), diabetes (49 %), ischaemic heart disease (30 %). The majority (68 %) developed mild disease, whilst 13 % required critical care. Combinations of drugs including hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, lopinavir, ritonavir, camostat, tocilizumab and steroids were used based on local guidelines. The median time to viral clearance defined by two negative PCR tests was 15 days [IQR 6-25]. Overall mortality in our cohort was 9.2 %, but ICU mortality was 65 %. COVID-19 IgG antibody serology was performed in a subset (n = 87) but 26 % of PCR positive patients (n = 23) did not develop a significant antibody response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports a lower mortality in this patient group compared with many published series. Asymptomatic PCR positivity was present in 40 %. Rapid isolation of positive patients may have contributed to the relative lack of spread of COVID-19 within our dialysis units. The lack of antibody response in a few patients is concerning.